This page makes one argument, and it is an argument about economics rather than medicine.
The gap is funding, not knowledge
Nobody disputes that a person on long-term opioid therapy should be assessed regularly. The question of whether monitoring is a good idea has not been seriously contested in twenty years.
What has never been resolved is who pays for it. Monitoring is time: a structured assessment, a conversation, a measurement repeated so it can be compared with the last one. That time is not a billable procedure. A practice that does it well is absorbing a cost, and a practice that does not is not penalized for the omission. The predictable result is that it happens where someone chooses to absorb the cost and does not happen elsewhere.
That is a textbook description of work that a charitable organization is better placed to carry than a market is. Our second test →
Why “just prescribe less” is not a safety plan
The policy response of the last fifteen years has largely treated the quantity of medication as the only variable available. It is not the only variable, and treating it as such produces a second population of harmed people alongside the first — those whose therapy was appropriate and was ended because ending it was the only lever anyone was measuring.
This site does not litigate that clinically. Sevadar Foundation is not a medical provider and makes no treatment claims. What it can say is that a program built on measurement gives a clinician something other than a blunt instrument, and that building the measurement is the part nobody funds. Read more: Monitoring is the alternative to abandonment.
What measurement means here
Three things, in the program’s scope: reliable delivery, so that variation is not just people running out; remote monitoring, so that the interval between assessments is not however long it happens to be; and psychometrics, so that what is recorded can be compared to what was recorded last time. intellarx.org
Questions
Does Sevadar Foundation prescribe or dispense anything?
No. The foundation delivers no clinical care of any kind and holds no clinical license. What we are not. Read more: Why a foundation should not practice medicine.
Is this a position on opioid policy?
It is a position on funding: monitoring is unfunded, and unfunded work is what charitable organizations exist to carry. Clinical questions belong to clinicians and to the program’s own site. Read more: Monitoring is the alternative to abandonment.
How does this connect to the other two programs?
All three are versions of the same bet: that attention paid on a schedule, by someone competent, to something nobody is watching, is the highest-yield intervention available. How the programs relate. Read more: One foundation, three programs.
This is a foundation page, not a clinical one. Sevadar Foundation provides no care and gives no medical advice. Everything about eligibility, services and how to be seen lives on the program’s own site. In an emergency call 911; if you are in crisis, call or text 988.